A medical educator enlightened me early-on that Covid was the science name for the irritable “common cold.” There are no effective vaccines for colds because by the time they are created and tested the bug has mutated. Why risk killing or crippling someone with a “warp-speed” toxic jab to temper a couple miserable weeks on earth.
Even after the virus was weaponized and released by Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar and their Wuhan Associates, safe and effective medications were still around to minimize its impact.
However, these good medications were media-smeared and good doctors threatened by these medical Nazis with punitive measures for docs healing people.
The Covid miscreants noted above along with Deborah Birx and Robert Redfield then concocted the killer protocol of Remdesivir, use of ventilators, and discarding ill loved ones into nursing homes. They added stifling masks, closed schools, small businesses, churches and various support groups. Don’t forget minimizing social interaction to break the human spirit.
It’s like they wanted to create fear, panic, a mental health crisis, and break the spirits of youngsters. They hoped to kill or damage people of all ages. Hospitals were paid millions in bonuses to terminate and abuse patients, deny their medical rights and isolate them from families.
Adventist Health has the gall to advertise that they are “Spreading the Love of Jesus.” Jesus said, “It would be better for him to have a millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown into the sea than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.”
And they all knew exactly what they were doing.
Donald Henderson, who died in 2016, was an icon in the field of epidemiology and public health. In 2006, he gave prophetic warnings that were ignored in March 2020.
Dr. Henderson was famous for a ten-year international mission from 1967–1977 that successfully eradicated smallpox. He then served as Dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health from 1977 to 1990. Toward the end of his career, Henderson worked on national programs for public health preparedness and the response needed following biological attacks and national disasters.
In 2006, Henderson and his colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Health Security, published an analysis, “Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza,” in the journal Biosecurity and Terrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science.
They studied options to curb the overall impact of a pandemic. This included a review of proposed biosecurity measures, later utilized for the first time during Covid - “large scale or home quarantine of people believed to have been exposed, travel restrictions, prohibitions of social gatherings, school closures, maintaining personal distance, and the use of masks.”
Even assuming a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 2.5%, roughly equal to the 1918 Spanish flu but far higher than for Covid, Henderson and his colleagues concluded that these mitigation measures would do far more harm than good.
The best strategy would be isolating symptomatic individuals (but not those who had merely been exposed) at home or in the hospital, a strategy that had long been part of traditional public health. They also cautioned against reliance on computer modeling to suggest interventions. “No model, no matter how accurate its epidemiologic assumptions, can illuminate or predict the secondary and tertiary effects of particular disease mitigation measures.” Furthermore, “If particular measures are applied for many weeks or months, the long-term or cumulative second and third order effects could be devastating socially and economically.”
The authors noted, “There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people.” They concluded, “The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.”
“Travel restrictions, such as closing airports and screening travelers at borders, have historically been ineffective.” Social distancing was also deemed impractical and ineffective.
During previous influenza epidemics, large public events were occasionally cancelled; but, the authors found no evidence “that these actions have had any definitive effect on the severity or duration of an epidemic,” and “closing theaters, restaurants, malls, large stores, and bars… would have seriously disruptive consequences.” The review offered proof that school closures would be ineffective and enormously harmful. They found no benefits of mask wearing outside the hospital setting.
Henderson and associates concluded: “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.”
For Covid, a devious and criminal agenda prevailed over science and medical sensibilities.
(Lou Binninger can be heard on No Hostages Radio podcast, live on KMYC 1410AM 10-1 Saturdays, read at Live with Lou on Facebook and at Nohostagesradio.com)
###